This is the one that hit me on June 20 and hasn't let go since.
We have to stop using AI one-dimensionally. The future is multi-dimensional.
For the non-nerds: don't picture your company as a fixed machine with buttons. Picture it as a living organism — AI teams that organize themselves and react to each other.
I have a hard time even putting this into words. Highly skilled colleagues call me crazy when I try. Maybe I am. Maybe I just think too abstract. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ But it keeps growing in my head, so here goes.
Why "organism" is the right word
This builds straight on /loops-are-for-noobs. A loop is one-dimensional: lock the target, go for it no matter what. A team reacts to the situation. And /teams is just the logical next step — the combination of skills + loops + routines + guardrails + hooks + agents + briefing + the dashboard — but multi-dimensional.
Same rocket picture as before: a loop is a dumb guided missile; a team is smart and reactive. Now scale that up from one team to a whole company. Stop modeling it as a rigid pipeline and start modeling it as a living organism — many self-coordinating teams that sense each other and adapt. That's not a metaphor I'm reaching for. It's just what it already feels like to run.
The tangible example
If you want something concrete, it's a-living-dev-team-multiverse — "BobHub", GitHub as an organism: open source that evolves itself.
And let me be honest about scope: I do not have the capital or the power to build that. It's so big that maybe even the big players would have to team up for it (GitHub + Anthropic, GitLab + OpenAI, ...). It's a thought-picture to show the concept, not a product announcement.
nerd: whoever does build it — don't forget to send me money. :)
There could be business models, sure — companies fund it and the deployment keeps running; open source offers support contracts without owning the infrastructure, because the need creates the infrastructure. But that's speculation. The idea is the point.
Why I'm so sure of the direction
Because I've lived this evolution already, just at human scale. I'm a full-stack one-man-army: I build the MVP, the company proves the concept, and then they hire a real team of professionals who do my old job better, faster, more effectively. (See the multi-purpose professional-model approach.)
That's exactly the move I see for AI — from one "full-stack AI" to a team of specialists. Same reasons. And the tech is already here; it's not about waiting, it's about using it right. It's not about what you can do anymore — it's about what you can imagine (and describe).
Or, beyond your imagination: The Company of 2028 →
